WebSep 30, 2015 · It was held, apparently for the first time, that a defendant to a liquidator’s preference claim could rely on section 553C of the Corporations Act 2001 to set-off a pre-appointment debt owed by a company (in liquidation) against the liquidator’s claim—at least, for debts incurred before they had notice of the company’s insolvency. WebJun 6, 2024 · Section 553c (1) is subject to subsection (2) which says that the set-off at (1) isn’t available in the event that at the time of giving credit to the company, or at the time of receiving credit from the company, the person had notice of …
Insolvency insights: Using the section 553C set-off to reduce …
WebLiquidators argue that under section 553 (c) (1) of the Corporations Act 2001 ( Act) a creditor is not able to set-off the outstanding indebtedness owed by the company to the creditor to reduce any liability of the creditor to refund any unfair preference. Similar arguments are made by liquidators in relation to insolvent trading claims. WebNorth Carolina Business Corporation Act. Article 1. General Provisions. Part 1. Short Title and Reservation of Power. § 55-1-01. Short title. This Chapter shall be known and may be … galahad close andover
Peter Leech on LinkedIn: Kiwi kids shoe brand Bobux goes under
WebPeter Leech’s Post Peter Leech Associate Director, Insolvency and Dispute Resolution, at Cowell Clarke 1d Report this post Report Report. Back ... WebFeb 24, 2024 · In the matter of Morton as liquidator of MJ Woodman Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Metal Manufacturers Pty Ltd [2024] FCAFC 228, the Full Court held that s. 553C of the Corporations Act 2001 was not available as a set-off defence to a preference claim brought by a liquidator. WebAccording to s 553C(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Act), if there have been mutual credits, debts or dealings between a company being wound up and a creditor, the sum … galahad et al crossword